I learned an expression from a friend that stuck with me: watermelon projects — green on the outside, red on the inside.
And the more projects I see, the clearer it becomes: this doesn’t happen by accident.
Projects turn into “watermelons” when hard conversations are avoided.
Rarely because of missing tools or frameworks.
Most of the time, because of fear.
Fear of:
- Upsetting the customer
- Looking incompetent
- Creating political tension
- Risking personal position
The intention often sounds reasonable:
“Let’s wait a bit longer”, “We’ll fix it later”, “Now is not the right time”.
But here’s the uncomfortable truth:
👉 ignored problems don’t disappear — they accumulate interest.
Whenever a status report contains only good news, I get cautious.
Either the project is unrealistically easy…
or reality is being filtered.
Status reports are not a showcase.
They are decision-making tools.
If there are no:
- clear risks
- real concerns
- uncomfortable trade-offs
then the project isn’t “green”.
It’s just well painted.
I like to compare this to aircraft maintenance.
No one waits for the engine to catch fire mid-flight to inspect it.
Small issues are addressed on the ground.
In the air, they become emergencies.
Hard conversations work the same way.
They’re uncomfortable early — but cheap.
Delayed, they become expensive — for the project, the customer, and the people.
A few lessons learned the hard way:
- Early risk communication is maturity, not weakness
- Transparency is not negativity
- Bad news shared early protects the project
- Only good news usually protects egos
Healthy projects are not those without problems.
They are the ones where reality is allowed to circulate.
In the end, the most important question isn’t:
“Is the project green?”
It’s:
“Do people feel safe saying when it’s not?”
Because the bill always comes due.
The difference is whether it arrives as a correction…
or as a crisis.
You must belogged in to post a comment.